Reminder: 25 days until ADA Title II requires WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance for public entity digital services and content.

ADA Title II compliance isn’t just about fixing documents. It’s about proving you did.

Title2Ready helps colleges, universities, and public institutions turn accessibility work into a defensible record: what you found, what you fixed, what you reviewed, and what you can show.

The deadline isn’t a date. It’s the first complaint. If you can show your work, your risk profile changes.

  • Show your work: audit-ready evidence of review, remediation, and validation.
  • Track at institutional scale: college → department → course → offering → document.
  • Remediation-agnostic: use any tools you prefer; keep governance and reporting in one place.

Where institutions get stuck

Most teams don’t fail due to lack of effort. They fail because the effort is hard to coordinate and even harder to prove.

If you haven’t started: we help you start correctly, with structure and evidence from day one.

If you have started: we help you turn scattered work into something organized, reportable, and defensible.

Start with workflow and evidence now; add more tools later as your program matures.

Products

Title2Ready products support document accessibility governance and execution. Start with tracking and evidence; add remediation tools as needed.

DRTS

Document Remediation Tracking System

A document-centered workflow and reporting system for ADA Title II readiness. Track inventories, triage decisions, remediation progress, validation, and generate exportable coordination views.

S2T

Speech-to-Text Remediation Assistant

Assistive tooling to accelerate remediation workflows where transcript text or accessible text alternatives are required.

Coming next

More tools are in development.

Don’t wait on future automation. The fastest way to improve readiness is to begin capturing your workflow and evidence now, so your audit trail is longer, clearer, and easier to defend.

Why documentation changes your risk

When accessibility is challenged, institutions are judged on more than a snapshot of technical state. They are judged on whether they have a credible process: prioritization, workflow, validation, accountability, and continuous improvement.

Read: About Compliance